Saturday, October 29, 2011
Backyard play
For similar, check out my post "best soccer is closest to home". http://joyofthepeople.blogspot.com/2009/03/best-soccer-is-closest-to-home.html
Sam Snow
Coaching Director
US Youth Soccer
(800) 4SOCCER
THINK GLOBALLY – ACT LOCALLY
Why Young Athletes Excel with Backyard Play
September 30, 2011
By Patrick Cohn
Gary Simmons, author of “Gymbag Wisdom,” and a sports performance specialist who concentrates on teens, has some interesting anecdotes to share about the athletes he works with in high school.
The top players he deals with are not the ones who play on traveling teams. They’re not necessarily the ones who spend all their time playing on more than one formal team year-round, he says.
No, the top players, he says, are the ones who, in addition to playing on organized teams, often play in the park, the backyard or the local gym with their friends and neighbors–without parents or coaches instructing them.
And just what is it about playing with friends in informal settings that allows kids to excel?
Kids who’ve spent a lot of time playing with friends are generally quicker on their feet and more coordinated, he says. What they also have—and this is key—higher levels of “exuberance,” says Simmons. As a result, they learn skills more quickly.
The teen athletes he sees who’ve experienced a lot of structured sports and traveling teams are often burnt out, he says. They’re less exuberant and don’t push themselves as hard.
“You can be a 12-year-old state champion tennis player and give 70% in practice,” he says. “The kids who are behind you skill wise–but are moving faster and trying harder–are more likely to excel at their skill.”
These kids who move faster and work harder–those who’ve had experience being competitive without the expectations of adults placed on them–often do well in competition when they’re placed in more structured settings.
In short, fun, unstructured play with friends can boost a young athletes’ mental game and performance.
It’s not always easy, in our world of structured activities, to find a place where kids can play around together….
One option, Simmons says, is to structure some unstructured play. That means parents might gather up the kids in their neighborhood and organize a weekly game of ball. But once the game is organized, the parents should step back and let the kids play.
Here at Kids’ Sports Psychology, we think parents and kids need to strike a delicate balance between structured play and unstructured play. Kids need some instruction to master skills, but they also need the enthusiasm, freedom, and passion required to be great players.
With enthusiasm and passion, which often are based on the fun of unstructured play, kids are more likely to play freely and creatively and take more risks. That means they’ll keep growing, learning and excelling. Kids who are burnt out or who lack enthusiasm for what they’re doing often just go through the motions. They’re less likely to excel.
Want to learn more about how you can improve your sports parenting skills and boost your kids’ enjoyment and success in sports? Check out Kids’ Sports Psychology.
Friday, October 14, 2011
Building the hours the right way
Not all training or "practice" is the same, each is different, each is important.
All practices fall along a continuum. On one end is free play, unstructured, fun, immediate, intrinsic; On the other end is Deliberate Practice which is the opposite, not inherently fun, extrinsic, performance related. One is "play" the other is "work" and they are both important. When you are young, lots of free play is important. Serious preparation fro the difficult competitions of life are forged not through hard work but with imagination, fun, and joy of free play. Bear cubs wrestle and play to prepare themselves for the demands of being a top of the food chain omnivore. And it works for kids too, especially in sports. The streets have always produced the best, most nuanced, most inspirational players in all sports. In soccer Ronaldo quit his youth academy team to stay and play with his Friends in the local pick up game, he is maybe the best striker the word has ever known, Zidane brought a new level of skill honed on the streets of Marseilles, Maradona, Messi, Cruyff, there is no greatness without free play.
But still it is not enough and here is why.
Building hours take thought and balance. Players may play a lot and not understand how to work toward goals. While others may understand the work may not be able to express themselves in a situation that calls for “play.”
I sent a younger (U13), but very technical, skillful player to participate in a U16 practice. I was hoping the skillful player and the team would bond. Now this kid grew up in the Refugee camps of Kenya. At this camp he spent hours just playing. barefoot, to small goals, all day and into the night under the illumination of car lights rigged overhead. He had moved to the US when he was 11. His ability to solve problems off the dribble was breathtaking.
The Team began by playing small sided in very tight space. The player scored 7 goals in 30 minutes, some of which were quite spectacular. At the end of practice the coach asked the players to run eight 200 yard repeats. The player made it through one, "Hey coach, how am I doing?' he said surprised, I think, that he had made it. On the next sprint he made it half way "Coach, I am having a heart attack," he said holding his chest.
The other players had no trouble giving effort to the sprints. The coach called me that night saying that the new player would not make his team. He did not complete his sprints. He lamented a bad attitude, a low capacity for work. Because he could not make himself run those sprints he would not be on the team.
But what about scoring goals under the pressure of three defenders in front of the goal? Doesn't matter.
My question to the coach was would you take one of your players, place him in front to goal, put three defenders on his back, pass him the ball with the instructions to score or you are off the team?
No.
Would you demand that that player finish those chances “or else?” That player has no more capacity to complete the task in front of the goal as the other player has to complete the 200m runs. While the one kid understood “PLAY” the others understood “WORK.” One kid had been brought up playing with no rules, or objectives, the other had been brought up under strict supervision and organization-- this player understands work. But both are incomplete.
I takes both, to move forward as we get older play morphs into work. David Beckham does not need free play, but he needs a lot of deliberate practice to remain fit, sharp, and ready. But in the US we front load deliberate practice, asking young kids to work, fight, compete. But soccer (and all sports) should be inclusive, imaginative, cooperative long before it becomes competitive.
If, as Montessori says, "play is the child's work," then "Work is the adults "Play."
So next time you here a coach say "Work hard and have fun," you understand they mean it.
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Serious need for free play
CARLO ROTELLA
A serious need for free play
By Carlo Rotella
SEPTEMBER 30, 2011
WHEN WRITING about the decline of children’s free play, it’s difficult to avoid sounding as if you’re pining for an idealized past. I sympathize with readers who glaze over when they see a sentence that begins, “When I was a kid. . . .’’ They know what’s coming: “. . .we just played outside with no adult supervision, we didn’t need electronic gadgets to amuse us or coaches to tell us how to have fun, we didn’t worry about predators or bullies or other bogeymen that fearful parents obsess about these days,’’ and so on. But it’s worth finding a way around the clichés to engage the significant truths behind them, because the subject of kids’ play is important.
Free play isn’t an “extra’’ to be squeezed in between lessons, practices, and screen time. Free play, meaning an activity chosen and directed by the participants and undertaken for its own sake (and not, say, because an adult will give them some kind of credential for doing it), is what kids are designed to do.
Children, like many other young animals, learn by playing. As Peter Gray, a psychologist at Boston College who recently published an essay entitled “The Decline of Play and the Rise of Psychopathology in Children and Adolescents,’’ says, “Children come into the world ready to play. It’s part of human nature, which means that natural selection favors it. It has an important role in human survival.’’
Free play teaches children how to make decisions, solve problems, exercise self-control, follow rules, regulate their emotions, get along with others, make friends, develop interests and competencies, and, as Gray puts it, “experience joy.’’ The “free’’ part matters. There’s a deceptively big difference between being told by an adult to get in line to take your turn on the slide and learning from interaction with other kids, through trial and error and conflict and cooperation, that it’s not OK to hog the slide.
So it matters that over the past half-century there’s been a steep decline in free play by children in this country and other developed nations. Contributing factors include the increasing dominance of the car, TV, and computer; the retreat from public space and public life; more school and homework; and more lessons, travel teams and other adult-directed programs that turn activities that used to be play into something more like school.
It’s not as if children aren’t learning anything these days. They’re just learning it from adults in structured settings. We increasingly favor a toolbox model of education in which an adult expert shows a child a basic skill, positively reinforces the child’s success, introduces a slightly more advanced skill, and so on until some kind of mastery is achieved.
The leverage in our culture increasingly favors this approach. “Nobody’s against play,’’ Gray points out, but it’s increasingly eroded by things we treat as more important. We’re so focused on testing and the idea of high-stakes competition — with kids in other countries who study harder, with applicants trying to amass grades and extracurriculars to get into college, and so on — that sticking up for free play has come to seem suspect: soft-headed, anti-achievement.
But free play is essential to a child’s development — not only to mental health, but to the acquisition of crucial abilities the child will need in life. To create more opportunities for your children to engage in free play, you have to go against the grain of our culture. Not only do you need to schedule fewer lessons, create more open time, and relax your control of your kids’ activities, you need to convince other parents to do the same. The more kids out there on the block, available to play, the more appealing it becomes to go out and play.
So you’ll have to go around to your neighbors and talk them into freeing up their children to play with yours. It will be a test of your ability to cooperate with others, solve problems, and regulate your emotions. Let’s hope you spent enough time as a kid jumping in mud puddles and playing pickup games with other kids to have developed these important life skills.
Carlo Rotella is director of American studies at Boston College. His column appears regularly in the Globe.Comments — coming soon. With the launch of subscriptions to BostonGlobe.com in October, subscribers will have the ability to comment on articles, with reporters and editors from the Globe joining in select conversations.